<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713</id><updated>2011-04-21T11:31:07.514-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Votelaw  -- Law and Politics</title><subtitle type='html'>At the intersection of law and politics: Campaign finance, redistricting, election law and administration, and politicians in legal trouble.

</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>463</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-116287071310674118</id><published>2006-11-06T19:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-11-06T19:38:33.106-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Keeping up with the Joneses</title><summary type='text'>just a small post to keep things alive.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/116287071310674118'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/116287071310674118'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_archive.html#116287071310674118' title='Keeping up with the Joneses'/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-116287054369971626</id><published>2006-11-06T19:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-11-06T19:35:43.716-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Considering ...</title><summary type='text'>... what has happened to other sites, I have decided to post here every so often.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/116287054369971626'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/116287054369971626'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_archive.html#116287054369971626' title='Considering ...'/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200333178</id><published>2003-05-23T10:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-23T10:14:21.626-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>This blog has moved

Please go to my new blog site.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200333178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200333178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200333178' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200332681</id><published>2003-05-23T08:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-23T08:44:24.776-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Maintenance work

There will be little blogging for a day or two while I do some behind the scenes maintenance.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200332681'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200332681'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200332681' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200323630</id><published>2003-05-21T12:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T12:44:43.930-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Hawaii criminal complaint in campaign finance case

Honolulu attorney Edward Y.C. Chun has been charged with assising a corporation in reimbursing contributions made by three employees to the campaign of Mayor Jeremy Harris, according to the Honolulu Advertiser.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323630'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323630'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200323630' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200323598</id><published>2003-05-21T12:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T12:37:43.586-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Kentucky GOP primary for governor

Cong. Ernie Fletcher won the Republican primary for governor with 57% of the vote.  State Rep. Steve Nunn, who tried to have Fletcher removed from the ballot, received 13%.  Nunn claimed that Fletcher was disqualified by the removal of his running mate Hunter Bates on the grounds that Bates had not met the 7-year residency requirement.  See the story in the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323598'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323598'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200323598' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200323547</id><published>2003-05-21T12:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T12:27:11.276-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Louisiana redistricting

The Justice Department has precleared the Louisiana House redistricting plan, according to  the Associated Press.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323547'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323547'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200323547' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200323537</id><published>2003-05-21T12:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T12:25:07.786-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>New York City council term limits extension

Here is a more complete story from Newsday on the state appellate decision Monday to allow some city council members to serve 10 years instead of the "two terms" provided in a voter-approved referendum.  The City Council had amended the law to allow members forced to serve a two-year term after redistricting to serve that term plus two 4-year terms.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323537'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323537'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200323537' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200323429</id><published>2003-05-21T12:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T12:06:40.383-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Canada begins consideration of electoral system reform

Rick Hasen has a post on his Election Law blog about the publication of the discussion paper, "Renewing Democracy:
Debating Electoral Reform in Canada."  I thought that I had mentioned that report months ago, but can't find it. 

Those interested in true reform of the electoral system would do well to review this report.  I'm currently </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200323429' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200323296</id><published>2003-05-21T11:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T12:31:36.580-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>More fallout from the Texas redistricting saga

Josh Marshall, whose Talking Points Memo has done a lot on the Texas story, has a column in The Hill today concerning the efforts of Tom DeLay to get federal involvement in the efforts to track down the runaway Democrats.  

The Democrats, in the meanwhile, are asking for "who knew what when" in the request from the Texas DPS to the Homeland </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323296'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200323296'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200323296' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200322773</id><published>2003-05-21T10:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T10:04:55.890-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado congressional district maps

Daniel Smith, of the U of Denver pol sci depaprtment, has clued me into the link to find the 2003 congressional plan passed by the legislature and now under attack.  Go here and click on "View Interactive Legislative District Maps" -- yes, that's what it says and the link confused me too.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200322773'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200322773'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200322773' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200322746</id><published>2003-05-21T10:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T10:02:02.980-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Mississippi judicial campaign investigation

The Biloxi Sun Herald reports today that Richard Scruggs paid off an $80,000 campaign loan for Supreme Court Justice Oliver Diaz.  Scruggs has 4 cases pending before the Supreme Court.  The paper does not say whether Diaz has recused himself from those cases.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200322746'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200322746'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200322746' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200322044</id><published>2003-05-21T08:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-21T08:02:09.616-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado redistricting

The Legislature has hired Richard Westfall to represent it in the suit brought by Sen. Mary Ann "Moe" Keller against the new redistricting plan.  See the AP story in the Rocky Mountain News.  For some reason, Democrats have objected to spending taxpayer money on this suit, according to the Denver Post.

Sen. John Andrews, the sponsor of the redistricting, defends his </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200322044'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200322044'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200322044' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200313787</id><published>2003-05-19T16:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-19T16:37:48.573-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>South Carolina doing a mid-term redistricting

The S.C. House is considering a bill to make minor changes to the court-ordered redistricting plan to reduce the number of split precincts.  See the AP story here.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200313787'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200313787'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200313787' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200313781</id><published>2003-05-19T16:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-19T16:34:33.160-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>New York City law extending term limits is OK

An appellate court has ruled that the City Council's amendment of the city term limits law is not invalid.  The Council passed the law because the term limits law would have unfairly affected the members of the council whose terms are shortened to 2 years because of redistricting.  Read the AP report here.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200313781'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200313781'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200313781' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200312167</id><published>2003-05-19T10:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-19T12:18:40.743-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>BCRA stay

Thanks to Marty Ledermar Of SCOTUSblog for providing a link to the stay order and partial dissent by the 3-judge court.  Two judges granted the stay and Judge Leon dissented in part.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200312167'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200312167'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200312167' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307792</id><published>2003-05-18T10:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T10:07:27.190-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Contributions by Iraq-rebuilding contractors

Thomas Hargrove of Scripts Howard News Service reports

Construction and engineering firms seeking federal contracts to rebuild war-torn Iraq made millions of dollars in political contributions last year, including extensive use of big-money donations to the major political parties.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307792'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307792'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307792' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307734</id><published>2003-05-18T09:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T09:49:54.630-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>DSCC complains to FEC about Club for Growth ads

The Rapid City Journal reported earlier this week,

Television ads that take Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., to task for opposing President Bush's tax-cut package break the new federal campaign-finance laws, Democratic leaders believe.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee filed a formal complaint against ad sponsor Club for Growth with the</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307734' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307712</id><published>2003-05-18T09:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T09:42:00.303-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Mississippi campaign finance/bribery probe

While the Washington Post has an article on this probe, the Clarion-Ledger has more details here, and here.  The Biloxi Sun Herald has several articles here, here, here, and here.

The basic allegation seems to be that Paul Minor is underwriting judicial election campaigns in return for rulings.  Since this is before a grand jury and almost nobody </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307712'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307712'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307712' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307576</id><published>2003-05-18T08:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T08:53:32.573-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>PR in Scotland

I reported earlier this week that the new coalition government in Scotland agreed to adopt Single Transferable Vote in local councils in Scotland.

The Glasgow Sunday Mail reports that Labour could lose control of 7 local councils because of the new system.

The Glasgow Herald has a column asking whether the proliferation of voting systems in Scotland means its voters are </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307576'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307576'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307576' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307400</id><published>2003-05-18T07:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T07:37:13.396-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Montana redistricting suit

The Helena (MT) Independent Record has an editorial today commenting on the GOP effort to undo the redistricting plan of the independent commission.

Yesterday, the AP reported on the initial hearing of the suit challenging the GOP's new law.  The judge "challenged the assertion that legislators were acting within their constitutional power in changing the criteria</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307400'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307400'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307400' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307390</id><published>2003-05-18T07:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T07:31:49.290-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado redistricting

Rep. McInnis and Beauprez claim that they knew nothing in advance about the filing of the redistricting plan (favorable to both) in the Colorado legislature -- despite the involvement of Tom DeLay and Karl Rove.  The "Spin Cycled" column in the Denver Post offers this contrary evidence.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307390'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307390'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307390' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200307365</id><published>2003-05-18T07:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T07:19:59.903-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas redistricting and the flight of the Killer Ds

How will history view the Killer Ds "hiding out" in Oklahoma for 4 days?  The El Paso Times offers this assortment of views.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307365'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200307365'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200307365' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200305887</id><published>2003-05-17T15:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-17T15:42:07.520-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Federal probe of Ga. Speaker

Paul McCord reports on Political State Report that there is a federal probe of the Georgia speaker of the house for using campaign funds for personal expenses, including making mortgage payments on his condo.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200305887'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200305887'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200305887' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200305503</id><published>2003-05-17T12:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-17T12:34:42.490-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Other redistricting stories

Green Party members are challenging the new redistricting plan for the Maine House because it divides the only Green-held district in the state.  See the story on News 8 WMTW.

Suffolk County, NY, has adopted a new redistricting plan on a party line vote.  Two Ds will be paired in one district.  Newsday has stories here, and here.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200305503'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200305503'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200305503' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200305488</id><published>2003-05-17T12:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-17T12:25:48.716-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Killer D's are back in Texas

Here are some stories on the week-long flight of the Killer D's.

Houston Chronicle, "Democrats kept an eye on each other,"  here
   and "Glad to be back home,"  here

Austin American Statesman -- "Wayward lawmakers back at Capitol, ready to get back to work now that redistricting is dead,"  here
   and "Both parties emerge with greater unity," by Dave </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200305488'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200305488'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200305488' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200302635</id><published>2003-05-16T14:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-16T14:57:00.316-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>More advice sought for defense fund

Another pol in trouble, James W. Treffinger, is seeking to use his leftover campaign funds for the defense of his criminal case.  See his request here.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200302635'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200302635'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200302635' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200302609</id><published>2003-05-16T14:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-16T14:46:45.790-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>An Analysis of Election Fraud

Demos has published a study of fraud in elections, "Securing the Vote: An Analysis of Election Fraud."  It finds that fraud is a small problem in American elections.  

Notice of this report came to me in "Democracy Dispatches," a email newsletter Demos sends out periodically.  To see the latest issue, click here and to sign up, click here.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200302609'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200302609'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200302609' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200300033</id><published>2003-05-16T06:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-16T06:28:04.630-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Texas strays return in triumph or obliquy

The Democrats have returned to the Capitol according to the Austin American-Statesman.  The paper also has PDFs of the current and proposed maps.

The Austin Chronicle publishes the statement of the absconding Democrats.

Bob Ray Sanders has a pro-Democratic commentary in the Fort Worth Star Telegram.  

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200300033'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200300033'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200300033' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200299962</id><published>2003-05-16T06:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-16T06:11:09.516-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado redistricting

The Colorado Supreme Court has agreed to hear the suit by Attorney General Ken Salazar against the Secretary of State, according to the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News.  Salazar has argued that the legislature cannot adopt a new redistricting plan after a state court has done so (following the earlier failure of the legislature to adopt a plan).

The Denver Post </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200299962'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200299962'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200299962' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200296648</id><published>2003-05-15T11:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-15T11:39:19.003-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado redistricting

The Colorado attorney general has filed a petition in the state supreme court asking it to rule that the redistricting law is illegal, according to a  Denver Post columnist and news story.  An editorial in the Post comments on the suit.  Another story is in the Rocky Mountain News.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200296648'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200296648'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200296648' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200296610</id><published>2003-05-15T11:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-15T11:30:11.476-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The latest "news" on the Texas strays

Willie Nelson has sent his good wishes, some red bandanas, and whiskey to the Democratic legislators holed up in Armore, OK, according to the AP.

A federal agency that is supposed to track terrorists was asked to trace the private plane of one of the Democrats, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.  Another story reports that the GOP leadership has stopped </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200296610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200296610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200296610' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200296504</id><published>2003-05-15T11:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-15T11:07:35.873-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Campaign Legal Center comments on Rep. Majette's request for Advsiory Opinion

Rep. Denise Majette has asked for an Advisory Opinion about the creation of a Legal Defense Fund.  The Campaign Legal Center has filed a comment pointing out the effect of the BCRA on the proposed fund.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200296504'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200296504'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200296504' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200293059</id><published>2003-05-14T19:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T19:21:16.490-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Forum

I received the following notice tonight:

The Berkeley Electronic Press, together with editor Nelson W. Polsby of UC Berkeley and managing editor Raymond J. La Raja of University of Massachusetts, Amherst, is pleased to announce a new issue of The Forum, a journal of applied research in contemporary politics.

In the third issue of The Forum, we give an early preview of the 2004 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200293059'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200293059'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200293059' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200293033</id><published>2003-05-14T19:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T19:11:37.130-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Indiana election cases

Marcia Oddi of the Indiana Law Blog was nice enough to send me a note about two cases from earlier in the year.

First, a decision by the state supreme court imposing a redistricting plan for the Indianapolis City/County Council.  The Court reversed the lower court decision because its plan was "uniformly supported by one major political party and uniformly opposed by </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200293033'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200293033'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200293033' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200291112</id><published>2003-05-14T11:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T11:38:33.456-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas Redistricting Maps

To view the current plan for Texas congressional districts, go to the Texas Legislative Council site, and click on "View Current Districts."  

To view the proposed GOP plan, go to the same site, click on "RedViewer," click on "All Other Redistricting Plans," and  choose Plan 1180.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200291112'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200291112'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200291112' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200290322</id><published>2003-05-14T09:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T09:15:20.683-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado redistricting map

The maps and data for the Congressional plan adopted by the Colorado court in early 2002 is here (Colorado official site) or here (NCEC site).  When I find a link to the new map, I will post it.  In the meanwhile, here is the act.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200290322'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200290322'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200290322' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200290229</id><published>2003-05-14T08:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T08:53:50.763-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Scotland to adopted Proportional Representation for local elections

According to the BBC and the Edinburgh Evening News, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have reached an agreement for a coalition government in Scotland.  One key point of the agreement is to introduce Single Transferable Vote at local council elections by 2007.  See the Lib Dem Manifesto.  Labour had opposed STV at the local </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200290229'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200290229'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200290229' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200289011</id><published>2003-05-14T05:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T05:11:37.323-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Suffolk County NY redistricting in court

The Suffolk County legislature failed to reach an agreement on a redistricting plan yesterday.  "U.S. District Judge Arthur Spatt has scheduled a hearing in a lawsuit filed by Suffolk Hispanic and African-American residents who say the legislature has failed to act in a timely manner to draw new lines. The current boundaries, they say, violate their </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200289011'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200289011'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200289011' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200288977</id><published>2003-05-14T04:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T04:59:59.346-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Today's roundup of stories on the Texas strays

Google News has 543 stories on the absconding Texas legislators.  Here are the ones that seem to add some new information:  
   Tom DeLay wants the feds to arrest the legislators, while the Texas DPS harasses legislators' families-- Houston Chronicle
   The Hill
   The Republicans are running ads for the arrest of some Democrats, publishing </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200288977'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200288977'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200288977' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200287290</id><published>2003-05-13T17:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-13T17:50:46.826-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Roundup on other redistricting news

Montana:  The Great Falls Tribune reports, as does the Billings Gazette,  that the Legislature has adopted an act to force the Secretary of State to reject the redistricting plan adopted by the Districting and Apportionment Commission.  Seems that the Dems ended up with a 3-2 majority on the Commission, and the GOP claims that the Commission plan is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200287290'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200287290'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200287290' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200287018</id><published>2003-05-13T16:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-13T16:34:11.710-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The latest on the Texas strays

The Dallas Morning News has this light-hearted story about the runaways in their "hideout" in Oklahoma.  Fox News reports that one Democrat was arrested near her Austin apartment.  

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200287018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200287018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200287018' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200283912</id><published>2003-05-13T07:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-13T07:00:30.543-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>AG won't defend new Colorado redistricting plan

The Rocky Mountain News reports that the state Attorney General refuses to defend the suit against the new congressional redistricting plan.  The Secretary of State is looking for an attorney to defend the plan.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200283912'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200283912'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200283912' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200283879</id><published>2003-05-13T06:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-13T06:56:37.200-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Latest on Texas redistricting

The Washington Post,  The Hill, the Austin American-Statesman,  and the Dallas Morning News have stories on the flight of the Democratic House members to stop action on the congressional redistricting bill.  The Texas papers report that the Dems are in a Holiday Inn in Ardmore, OK, and the Texas law officers are seeking federal authority to arrest the legislators.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200283879'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200283879'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200283879' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200283751</id><published>2003-05-13T06:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-13T06:38:15.583-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Providian National Bank wants to market political party affinity credit cards

Providian National Bank, a large credit card issuer, has requested an advisory opinion from the FEC whether it may enter into agreements with national political parties to use their mailing lists to solicit customers for credit cards branded with the political party name and symbol.  If the customer chose a rebate </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200283751'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200283751'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200283751' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200281534</id><published>2003-05-12T18:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T18:08:00.690-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Draft advisory opinion on refunds to contributors

The General Counsel has circulated to the FEC commissioners a draft advsiory opinion to the Virginia Highlands Advancement Fund.  The VHAF received a refund from the IRS and wants to know what it may do with the funds.  The draft opinion advises that the Fund should make pro rata refunds to its contributors.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200281534'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200281534'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200281534' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200280013</id><published>2003-05-12T12:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T12:27:32.550-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado redistricting plan revised, Dems sue

The Colorado papers have several stories concerning the hasty adoption of a new congressional redistricting plan in Colorado, and the suit by the Democrats to block the new plan.  See the stories in the Denver Post,  Rocky Mountain News, the Aurora Sentinel, and AP via the DenverChannel.com.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200280013'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200280013'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200280013' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200279971</id><published>2003-05-12T12:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T12:19:01.373-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>More on redistricting in Texas

The Associated Press via the Houston Chronicle reports that John Alford, a Rice University political scientist who has advised Republicans on redistricting, has denounced the proposed redistricting plan as "a pro-Republican partisan gerrymander on top of an already pro-Republican existing plan."

The Austin American-Statesman reports that one Democratic House </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200279971'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200279971'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200279971' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200279925</id><published>2003-05-12T12:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T12:07:35.240-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas House Democrats walk out

Charles Kuffner of Political State Report says that 52 House Democrats have taken off for parts unknown to protest the Republican redistricting plan, among other things.  The House rules require 100 members (2/3) for a quorum.  The 52 absconders make it impossible to obtain a quorum.


</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200279925'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200279925'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200279925' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200277953</id><published>2003-05-12T06:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T06:51:19.436-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Legal Times wrap up on McConnell v. FEC

Despite the title, "Campaign Finance Ruling Gives No Satisfaction" reports on both the good and the bad points for lots of positions in the case.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200277953'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200277953'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200277953' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200272684</id><published>2003-05-10T15:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T15:58:30.653-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Wisconsin corruption trial

Former Assembly Speaker Scott Jensen, who faces felony charges of misconduct in public office, has used nearly $100,000 from his campaign fund to pay for his legal defense, federal records show. 
...
State law allows politicians to use campaign money for their legal defense against alleged campaign finance or election law violations as long as they get the donors' </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200272684'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200272684'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200272684' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200271940</id><published>2003-05-10T11:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T11:03:45.890-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Colorado GOP plans another Congressional redistricting

Luis at Poltical state Report has a post on the plan to remap the congressional districts in Colorado.  
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271940'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271940'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200271940' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200271930</id><published>2003-05-10T10:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T10:56:52.856-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Katrina Leung

Joshua Micah Marshall's Talking Points has a long post about the failure of the media to mention Katrina Leung's fundraising for Republicans when reporting her indictment for passing secrets to the Chinese.  (Thanks to TalkLeft for the link.)  TPM has these follow-ups:  here, here, here.


</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271930'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271930'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200271930' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200271817</id><published>2003-05-10T10:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T10:20:42.863-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>IRS publishes Q&amp;A on new Section 527 requirements

The Internal Revenue Service has published a Revenue Ruling in a question and answer format on the new requirements for political organizations.  Here is the introduction to the Ruling:

On November 2, 2002, Pub. L. 107-276 was enacted, amending § 527 of the Code. The new law amends the reporting and disclosure requirements for tax-exempt </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271817'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271817'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200271817' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200271796</id><published>2003-05-10T10:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T10:15:45.913-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Many parties seek stay on BCRA ruling

After the NRA filed its motion to stay the decision in McConnell v FEC, the court entered an order requiring all motions to be filed by noon on Friday.  The order is here.  You may see the  stay applications at the Campaign Media Center's site.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271796'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271796'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200271796' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200271742</id><published>2003-05-10T10:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T10:01:29.703-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas Democrats sue over campaign violations, while GOP proposes another shafting

Two Democrats who lost in legislative races are suing Texans for a Republican Majority (founded by Cong. Tom DeLay) for not reporting all the funds it collected and expended on behalf of winning Republican candidates.  Under Texas law, losing candidates may sue for twice the amount not reported. See the story in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271742'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271742'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200271742' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200271282</id><published>2003-05-10T07:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-10T07:31:49.253-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Drug Czar and Nevada campaign finance disclsoure

The National Law Journal reports,
Federal "drug czar" John P. Walters campaigned against a Nevada ballot proposal to legalize possession of up to 3 ounces of marijuana, but he refuses on constitutional grounds to file a campaign spending report. 
...
Special Assistant Attorney General Jonathan L. Andrews wrote that it is "extremely likely</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271282'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200271282'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200271282' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200260420</id><published>2003-05-08T04:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-08T04:46:50.113-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Kentucky governor's race

The Louisville Courier-Journal reports today:

Front-runner Ernie Fletcher can remain on the May 20 Republican primary ballot for governor because he had the right to name a new running mate for lieutenant governor, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously yesterday. 
Meanwhile, among the Democrats ...
Two Democratic candidates for governor released a flurry of TV</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200260420'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200260420'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200260420' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200258494</id><published>2003-05-07T17:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-07T17:15:30.300-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>McConnell v FEC

As usual, the Campaign Legal Center is doing a great job in gathering and putting on the web all the documents in the McConnell case.  In addition to the decision and opinions, the CLC has posted summaries by many of the interested parties, a link to the documents unsealed by the court, and the stay motions filed in the case.  To see the jurisdictional statement filed by </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200258494'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200258494'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200258494' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200246775</id><published>2003-05-05T16:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-05T16:15:45.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Jurisdictional Statement Filed by Opponents of Campaign Finance Law 

SCOTUSblog reports:
 
The lead plaintiffs in McConnell v. FEC have already filed a jurisdictional statement in the Supreme Court seeking review of those portions of the three-judge court's opinion that upheld significant provisions of the BCRA, and that concluded that challenges to other provisions were nonjusticiable at </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200246775'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200246775'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200246775' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200246772</id><published>2003-05-05T16:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-05T16:13:32.990-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Purdue v. Baker 

SCOTUSblog reports today:
 
The Georgia Supreme Court has announced it will be web-casting the oral argument in Purdue v. Baker, the fight over whether the state AG or instead the governor, has control over redistricting litigation now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. The argument will be tomorrow at 10am, and the web-cast is supposed to be available at this link. Many</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200246772'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200246772'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200246772' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200242297</id><published>2003-05-04T21:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-04T21:18:32.206-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>AO request: Home Depot

Home Depot, Inc., has requested an Advsory Opinion.  It wishes to give a pin advertising the company's separate segreted fund to the contributions to the fund.  Home Depot wants to know if it can give these pins and whether the employees can wear them.  (Warning: I have been able to read the request online, but any attempt to print it has frozen my computer.)
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242297'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242297'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200242297' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200242285</id><published>2003-05-04T21:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-04T21:14:32.503-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>AO request: Rep. Majette's defense fund

Rep. Denise Majette (D-Ga4) defeated Rep. Cynthia McKinney in the Democratic primary last year.  Supporters of McKinney have brought suit against Majette charging violations of the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution because an alleged conspiracy to have Republicans vote in the Democratic primary.  Majette has requested an Advisory Opinion that funds </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242285'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242285'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200242285' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200242259</id><published>2003-05-04T21:05:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-04T21:05:47.826-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC Advisory Opinion re payroll deductions for PAC

At the meeting on 8 May, the FEC will consider the draft Advosory Opinion to the Public Services Enterprise Group, Inc..  PSEG wants to transfer all payroll deduction authorization from one separate segregated fund to another.  The draft authorizes this if certain conditions are met.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242259'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242259'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200242259' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200242258</id><published>2003-05-04T21:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-04T21:05:47.780-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC Advisory Opinion re payroll deductions for PAC

At the meeting on 8 May, the FEC will consider the draft Advosory Opinion to the Public Services Enterprise Group, Inc..  PSEG wants to transfer all payroll deduction authorization from one separate segregated fund to another.  The draft authorizes this if certain conditions are met.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242258'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200242258'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200242258' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200239983</id><published>2003-05-04T06:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-04T06:31:55.976-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>McConnell v FEC fallout

Can parties start raising and spending soft money?  That's the question discussed in this article from the New York Times and this one in the Washington Post.

While I have been tied up in depositions (yes, even on Saturday), Rick Hasen, Howard Bashman,  and SCOTUSblog have  been collecting news stories and making intelligent commentary about the case.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200239983'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200239983'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200239983' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200235187</id><published>2003-05-02T14:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-02T14:51:46.293-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>McConnell v FCC

The Court has issued the McConnell decision.  Get it here.  The main opinion is 171 pages, and pages 5-15 contain a summary of all the rulings.  Each of the judges wrote separately on some issues.  The Court also issued a ruling on the sealed material -- it appears that much of the information previously sealed must be refiled as part of the public record.

This is the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200235187'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200235187'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200235187' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200221221</id><published>2003-04-30T06:26:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-30T06:26:28.056-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC may investigate head of Common Cause

The Hill carries an article today on a possible investigation by the FEC.  Here are excerpts:

Campaign fundraising reports for Chellie Pingree, a former Democratic Senate candidate form Maine who now heads Common Cause, contain numerous infractions that may prompt an audit by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), The Hill has learned.

...

Last</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200221221'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200221221'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200221221' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200221210</id><published>2003-04-30T06:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-30T06:22:44.826-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Great Texas Map Theft

Here is The Hill story about the latest allegations in the alleged theft of the GOP's proposed redistricting map in the Texas Capitol building.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200221210'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200221210'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200221210' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200221178</id><published>2003-04-30T06:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-30T06:17:00.856-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Georgia v. Ashcroft

Here is the story on the argument from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200221178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200221178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200221178' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200218487</id><published>2003-04-29T15:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-29T15:24:41.716-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Georgia v. Ashcroft

Here is the report of the AP on the argument earlier today in the Supreme Court.  Georgia appealed a decision holding that its redistricting plans violated Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200218487'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200218487'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200218487' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200215510</id><published>2003-04-29T06:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-29T06:25:30.036-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC's ruling on alleged party-controlled groups

The New York Times and Washington Post have articles today about the decision of the FEC to drop complaints against The Leadership Forum and the Democratic State Parties Organization.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200215510'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200215510'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200215510' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200214302</id><published>2003-04-28T22:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-28T22:42:39.236-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Blogs, Esq.

Robert Ambrogi was kind enough to mention this blog in his article, Blogs, Esq. in Corporate Counsel.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200214302'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200214302'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200214302' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200214031</id><published>2003-04-28T21:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-28T21:23:21.136-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC takes mixed action on complaint charging evaision of BCRA by both parties (2)

Trevor Potter has written to me:

The Campaign Legal Center now has all the public components of the FEC
case released today involving complaints against 'shadow party'
committees up on its website. This includes the General Counsel's Report
and recommendations, and the statements of reasons of the two </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200214031'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200214031'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200214031' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200214026</id><published>2003-04-28T21:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-28T21:19:35.640-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC takes mixed action on complaint charging evaision of BCRA by both parties

The FEC has decided by a 4-1 vote that the Republican National Committee violated the BCRA by giving $1 million to The Leadership Forum, but only admonished them (because the Leadership Forum gave the money back).  By a 4-2 vote, the FEC also dismissed a complaint against the Democratic National Committee claiming it</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200214026'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200214026'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200214026' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200210529</id><published>2003-04-28T08:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-28T08:30:02.216-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Georgia Redistricting

The Fulton Daily Report has this report on tomorrow's argument in Georgia v. US.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200210529'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200210529'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200210529' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200208716</id><published>2003-04-27T22:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-27T22:43:18.833-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Sen. Lieberman Wants FBI probe of GOP contributions

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), a leading Democratic candidate for president, has asked the Justice Department and FBI to investigate whether an accused spy [Katrina Leung] may have illegally funneled Chinese government money into Republican coffers in the 1990s, according to a letter he sent Friday.

By calling for a campaign finance </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200208716'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200208716'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200208716' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200204018</id><published>2003-04-26T13:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-26T13:11:48.413-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Federal candidates and state initiative campaigns

Larry Levine wrote me about my prior post about Flake:

Does the Clean Election Fund provide funds for candidates for federal offices or just for state offices? If it is the latter, then the use of federal funds would probably NOT be permitted under BCRA. If it funds both
state and federal races, can federal funds be spent to repeal the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200204018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200204018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200204018' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200202967</id><published>2003-04-26T06:32:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-26T06:32:45.193-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Kentucky GOP gubernatorial primary

Kentuckians continue to check the newspaper daily or the radio bulletins hourly to find out who is running for governor in the Republican primary.  

The problems all started when Ernie Fletcher chose Hunter Bates as his running mate.  Bates had lived out of state for most of the last decade, working in Washington for law firms and Sen. McConnell, while </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200202967'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200202967'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200202967' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200201876</id><published>2003-04-25T18:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-25T18:48:37.980-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Federal candidates and state initiative campaigns

The request (of Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.)) to the FEC for an Advisory Opinion has drawn several comments.  Flake set up a group called Stop Taxpayer Money for Politicians Committee which wants to circulate petitions for an initiative to repeal the Clean Elections fund in Arizona.  The problem is that Flake is a federal official and he is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200201876'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200201876'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200201876' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200201735</id><published>2003-04-25T17:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-25T17:53:12.860-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas Association of Business loses in federal court

The Texas Association of Business had sued a bunch of losing candidates in federal to forestall them from suing the TAB in state court.  (I would tell you where I had talked about this before, but Blogger is once again not showing my archives.)

The federal court has now dismissed TAB's complaint and ordered it to pay the attorneys' fees </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200201735'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200201735'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200201735' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200199186</id><published>2003-04-25T09:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-25T09:16:18.590-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Maryland's ban on "walking around money" is overturned

Here are a few excerpts from the Baltimore Sun article (thanks to Richard Winger for the article):

A Prince George's Circuit Court judge declared unconstitutional yesterday a state law barring the payment of Election Day poll workers, and threw out criminal charges against three workers tied to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s 2002 election</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200199186'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200199186'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200199186' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200198827</id><published>2003-04-25T08:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-25T08:17:59.330-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC adopts Advisory Opinion to Virginia officials and Rep. Cantor

The FEC apparently adopted a modified version of the General Counsel's draft advisory opinion according to the details in this AP story.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200198827'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200198827'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200198827' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200198764</id><published>2003-04-25T08:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-25T08:10:49.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Gingrich non-profits off the hook with IRS

The IRS has renewed the tax-exempt status of two non-profit groups organized by Newt Gingrich.  The IRS had said 2 years ago that the groups had engaged in partisan activities and therefore could not be tax exempt.  See the story here from the Washington Post.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200198764'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200198764'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200198764' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200194663</id><published>2003-04-24T11:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-24T11:42:26.343-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC Advisory Opinion on Federal Officials and State Campaigns

Just before today's meeting of the FEC, Commissioner David Mason filed a proposed revision of the General Counsel's draft advisory opinion in response to the questions of several Virginia state and local officeholders and Congressman Eric Cantor. They asked how much involvement Cantor could have in state and local campaigns.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194663'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194663'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200194663' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200194559</id><published>2003-04-24T11:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-24T11:16:35.483-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Pending requests for FEC advisory opinions

The AP had a story yesterday about the requests for advisory opinions by Rory Reid, Eric Cantor, and Jeff Flake.  Old news to those who read this blog.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194559'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194559'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200194559' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200194515</id><published>2003-04-24T11:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-24T11:10:03.033-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Follow up on two items

The Washington Post has two short reports about Sen. Kerry using his wife's fortune in his presidential campaign and the possibility of President Bush not being on the ballot in Alabama because of the lateness of the convention.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194515'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194515'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200194515' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200194473</id><published>2003-04-24T11:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-24T11:01:59.160-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Paralegal's donations to Edwards under investigation

Tom Edsall of the Washington Post reports that the Justice Department is investigating the donations made by employees of a Little Rock, Arkansas, law firm.  My earlier post on this is here.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194473'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194473'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200194473' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200194435</id><published>2003-04-24T10:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-24T10:56:11.546-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Georgia Redistricting sideshow

Rick Hasen agrees with Howard Bashman and me regarding the Georgia Supreme Court case not being moot just because the U.S. Supreme Court has heard the argument.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194435'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200194435'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200194435' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200192644</id><published>2003-04-24T05:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-24T05:18:54.253-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas Redistricting

The Texas Attorney General has opined that the Legislature may, but is not compelled to, redistrict Congressional districts this year.  

Here is an article from the Dallas News on this and the alleged theft of the DeLay map.  The article includes a categorical denial by Gerry Hebert that a theft occured.


</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200192644'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200192644'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200192644' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200190568</id><published>2003-04-23T16:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-23T16:12:29.810-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Georgia Supreme Court to hear governor v. attorney general appeal

The Georgia Supreme Court will hear the appeal of the Governor over his right to withdraw the state's appeal of the adverse decision in the Voting Rights Act preclearance case.  The hearing will be on 6 May, about a week after the argument in the U.S. Supreme Court.  Although the Atlanta Journal Constitution suggests that the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200190568'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200190568'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200190568' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200189065</id><published>2003-04-23T11:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-23T11:22:11.550-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Will Bush be on the ballot in Alabama?

According to the AP, the Republican Convention is being held so late that the Republicans will miss the Alabama deadline for nominating their presidential candidate.

Thanks to J.J. Gass for noting this story.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200189065'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200189065'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200189065' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200188104</id><published>2003-04-23T08:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-23T08:28:41.123-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC Advisory Opinion on Federal Officials and State Campaigns

Common Cause and Democracy 21 have filed a comment with the FEC endorsing the General Counsel's draft of the advisory opinion.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200188104'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200188104'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200188104' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200188046</id><published>2003-04-23T08:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-23T08:18:58.336-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Texas GOP accuses Gerry Hebert of stealing their map

The Hill has a story in today's issue about the Texas redistricting map I mentioned here.

The Republicans say that they left the map in a public hearing room and that it was gone a while later.  They claim that they have viewed a security "tape of some guys walking down the hallway with what appeared to be [the Republican aide's] stuff.?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200188046'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200188046'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200188046' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200187935</id><published>2003-04-23T08:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-23T08:06:07.746-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC Advisory Opinion on Federal Officials and State Campaigns

Here is an article in The Hill discussing the forthcoming advisory opinion I have discussed here and here.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200187935'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200187935'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200187935' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200185388</id><published>2003-04-22T19:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-22T19:24:07.473-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC requests public comment on enforcement procedures

The FEC is considering a request for public comment on its enforcement procedures and how they might be improved.  The draft notice is at http://fecweb1.fec.gov/agenda/mtgdoc03-28.pdf.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200185388'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200185388'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200185388' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200184768</id><published>2003-04-22T16:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-22T16:24:26.110-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>FEC Advisory Opinion on Federal Officials and State Campaigns

At Thursday's meeting of the FEC, the Commissioners will have two versions of the proposed advisory opinion to Cong. Eric Cantor and several Virginia state and local officials.  The General Counsel has proposed one version (discussed here), and Commissioner Bradley Smith has proposed another.

While Smith's draft places more </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200184768'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200184768'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200184768' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200179357</id><published>2003-04-21T17:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-21T17:28:56.716-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Corruption in New Jersey

From today's Morning Edition, "NPR's Nancy Solomon reports that the prosecution of New Jersey politicians is on the rise. Christopher Christie -- the state's new U.S. attorney -- has made stamping out corruption a priority. Within his first year in office, Christie has doubled the number of attorneys working on political corruption."  Listen to the story here.

</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200179357'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200179357'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200179357' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200179335</id><published>2003-04-21T17:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-21T17:23:54.173-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Leung case

TalkLeft has an excellent wrap-up of the Leung case, emphasizing the campaign finance aspects of the case.  Katrina Leung is the woman recently arrested for passing American secrets to the Chinese government (China, the big one, not Taiwan) while supposedly acting as an informer for the FBI.  Her handler/lover has been arrested as well.

Since my first post on this case, I </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200179335'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200179335'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200179335' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3616713.post-200178686</id><published>2003-04-21T14:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-04-21T14:55:15.123-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>2 FEC Commissioners propose changes in presidential matching fund

FEC Commissioners Scott Thomas and Michael Toner have proposed that Congress change the amount candidates could spend (from $40 million to $75 million), increase the checkoff on the tax return to $5, and allow matching of the first $500 of each contribution (up from $250), according to the Washington Post.
</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200178686'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3616713/posts/default/200178686'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://votelaw.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_archive.html#200178686' title=''/><author><name>Edward</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02223045064609528948</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
